{"id":27602,"date":"2011-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-07T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ashleydev.com\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/"},"modified":"2020-08-27T11:45:06","modified_gmt":"2020-08-27T15:45:06","slug":"canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/","title":{"rendered":"Canadian Nuclear Attitude&nbsp;Survey"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One month after the earthquake and tsunami struck northeastern Japan, the <a title=\"Canadian Nuclear Association\" href=\"https:\/\/cna.ca\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Canadian Nuclear Association<\/a> commissioned a professional, <a title=\"Canadian Nuclear Attitude Survey (PDF)\" href=\"https:\/\/cna.ca\/english\/pdf\/studies\/Polling_Deck_2011.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Canada-wide opinion poll<\/a> to gain insight into what Canadians are thinking about nuclear.<\/p>\n<p>The results are mixed \u2013 as was expected after a large event like the Fukushima accident in March 2011. But we did hear about the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for our industry. For example, we learned that while Canadians were paying close attention to Fukushima and were concerned about its Canadian implications, Canadian operators and regulators were seen to be taking the issue seriously.<\/p>\n<p>Since the tragedy, the nuclear industry \u2013 at home and around the world \u2013 has been working to share valuable lessons learned from the tragedy to ensure safety standards and policies reflect current findings. To date we have:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Participated\u00a0 as a nuclear community to review and respond to the situation in Japan. <a title=\"Ontario Power Generation\" href=\"http:\/\/www.opg.com\/index.asp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Ontario Power Generation<\/a>\u2019s (OPG) CEO \u2013 Tom Mitchell \u2013 was appointed by The <a title=\"World Association of Nuclear Operators\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wano.info\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">World Association of Nuclear Operators<\/a> (WANO) to chair a special 14-member, \u201cPost-Fukushima\u201d commission to review the lessons of this event and develop recommendations on an appropriate industry response;<\/li>\n<li>Outlined to the <a title=\"Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)\" href=\"http:\/\/nuclearsafety.gc.ca\/eng\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)<\/a> a series of actions to verify the safety of our nuclear generating stations; and<\/li>\n<li>Been in regular communication with nuclear organizations around the world and has launched extensive fact-based communication initiatives to keep Canadians informed and assured about the safety our own nuclear facilities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In addition, OPG released a preliminary report to the <a title=\"Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)\" href=\"http:\/\/nuclearsafety.gc.ca\/eng\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)<\/a> on lessons learned to date from the Fukushima event. Their overall conclusion is that OPG\u2019s nuclear plant systems are robust enough to withstand significant emergencies. They looked carefully at Japan and identified opportunities where our industry can further improve. For example, they saw that irradiated fuel bays were an issue in Japan. They caught fire. OPG confirmed that its fuel bays would not experience such a failure.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, our industry is\u00a0 looking at ways to address even the most improbable events \u2013 like major flooding and major earthquakes and ensuing emergencies in their aftermath. We will continue to be open and transparent about our safety measures.\u00a0 We are also broadening the sharing of information and expertise with the rest of the industry worldwide \u2013 and continuing to support organizations like WANO, which are also dedicated to this goal. The nuclear energy industry is an international community with a shared body of professional expertise and operating experience. The more members share and communicate, the safer and more efficient our operations become.<\/p>\n<p>Immediately following events in Japan, the Governments of <a title=\"Government of Ontario\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ontario.ca\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Ontario <\/a>and <a title=\"Government of Saskatchewan\" href=\"http:\/\/www.gov.sk.ca\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Saskatchewan <\/a>both reiterated their commitments to nuclear energy and research. In fact, the <a title=\"Joint Review Panel for Proposed Darlington New Nuclear Power Plant Project\" href=\"http:\/\/nuclearsafety.gc.ca\/eng\/commission\/joint_review_panel\/darlington\/index.cfm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Joint Review Panel for the Darlington New Nuclear Project<\/a> took place in March and April 2011. The CNA was proud to be a positive intervener at the hearings to remind the Panel about our industry\u2019s strong record of safety, and the many social and economic benefits the project will bring to both Ontario and Canada. During the hearings, more than 120 oral and written submissions were made in support of the project. Most of these came from the local community.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Here are additional highlights from the polling:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Support for nuclear declined post-Fukushima. National support for nuclear energy in general fell from 48% in January 2009, to 43% in August 2009 and March 2010, to 38% in April 2011.<\/p>\n<p>There is strong support for nuclear research and development in all regions (even in Quebec \u2013 55%) and at all income levels.<\/p>\n<p>Opinion continues to be regionally polarized:\u00a0 support for nuclear energy is 53% in Ontario versus 17% in Quebec.\u00a0 Ontario support has held up fairly well post-Fukushima. After Ontario, the region most supportive of nuclear energy is Alberta (46% favourable).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>63% think Canadian nuclear is \u201camong safest in the world\u201d<\/li>\n<li>60% think it is \u201cavailable and reliable\u201d<\/li>\n<li>55% think nuclear is \u201cclean\u201d and \u201cbrings benefits to all Canadians\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"attachment_439\" style=\"width: 668px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-439\" class=\"size-full wp-image-439   \" title=\"Chart28\" src=\"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Chart281.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"658\" height=\"346\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-439\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Q: Now I am going to read some statements about nuclear energy. Please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree with the following statements:<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Over two-thirds think nuclear plant companies are taking the events in Fukushima seriously<\/strong><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_437\" style=\"width: 496px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-437\" class=\"size-full wp-image-437  \" title=\"OperatorsChart10\" src=\"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/OperatorsChart10.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"486\" height=\"345\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-437\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Q: From what you have read, seen or heard, how seriously do you think the companies that operate Canadian nuclear power plants are taking the issue of the safety of nuclear power generation in Canada?<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Almost three-quarters agree regulatory agencies take nuclear safety seriously<\/strong><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_436\" style=\"width: 460px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-436\" class=\"size-full wp-image-436 \" title=\"RegulatorChart11\" src=\"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/RegulatorChart11.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"450\" height=\"337\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-436\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Q: And from what you have read, seen or heard, how seriously do you think the government agencies that regulate Canadian nuclear power plants are taking the issue of the safety of nuclear power generation in Canada?<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Just over half support upgrading and refurbishing existing nuclear plants<\/strong><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_435\" style=\"width: 499px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-435\" class=\"size-full wp-image-435 \" title=\"Chart22\" src=\"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Chart221.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"489\" height=\"311\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-435\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Q: Many large power-generating plants in Canada with various fuel sources will have to be replaced over the next 10 to 15 years because they are aging. In Ontario 80% of the plants will have to be replaced. In order to help meet Canada\u2019s future electricity demand, would you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Polling was conducted by <a title=\"Innovative Research Group\" href=\"http:\/\/www.innovativeresearch.ca\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Innovative Research Group<\/a>, Inc.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One month after the earthquake and tsunami struck northeastern Japan, the Canadian Nuclear Association commissioned a professional, Canada-wide opinion poll to gain insight into what Canadians are thinking about nuclear. The results are mixed \u2013 as was expected after a large event like the Fukushima accident in March 2011. But we did hear about the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[537],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-27602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talknuclear"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Canadian Nuclear Attitude Survey - Association nucl\u00e9aire canadienne<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Canadian Nuclear Attitude Survey - Association nucl\u00e9aire canadienne\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"One month after the earthquake and tsunami struck northeastern Japan, the Canadian Nuclear Association commissioned a professional, Canada-wide opinion poll to gain insight into what Canadians are thinking about nuclear. The results are mixed \u2013 as was expected after a large event like the Fukushima accident in March 2011. But we did hear about the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Association nucl\u00e9aire canadienne\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/canadanuclear\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-07T04:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-27T15:45:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Chart281.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"cna_admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"cna_admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"cna_admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b0c8179b9b04ade90057bc7a30b2fbd2\"},\"headline\":\"Canadian Nuclear Attitude&nbsp;Survey\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-07T04:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-27T15:45:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":863,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/talknuclear.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/Chart281.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Talk Nuclear\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/\",\"name\":\"Canadian Nuclear Attitude Survey - Association nucl\u00e9aire canadienne\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/talknuclear.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/Chart281.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-07T04:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-27T15:45:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/talknuclear.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/Chart281.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/talknuclear.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/Chart281.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/2011\\\/07\\\/07\\\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Canadian Nuclear Attitude&nbsp;Survey\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Canadian Nuclear Association\",\"description\":\"The national voice of the Canadian nuclear industry since 1960\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Canadian Nuclear Association\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/cropped-cna-logo-only.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/cropped-cna-logo-only.png\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Canadian Nuclear Association\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/canadanuclear\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/canadanuclear\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/canadanuclear\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/CanadaNuclear\",\"http:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/canadian-nuclear-association\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b0c8179b9b04ade90057bc7a30b2fbd2\",\"name\":\"cna_admin\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cna.ca\\\/fr\\\/author\\\/cna_admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Canadian Nuclear Attitude Survey - Association nucl\u00e9aire canadienne","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Canadian Nuclear Attitude Survey - Association nucl\u00e9aire canadienne","og_description":"One month after the earthquake and tsunami struck northeastern Japan, the Canadian Nuclear Association commissioned a professional, Canada-wide opinion poll to gain insight into what Canadians are thinking about nuclear. The results are mixed \u2013 as was expected after a large event like the Fukushima accident in March 2011. But we did hear about the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/","og_site_name":"Association nucl\u00e9aire canadienne","article_publisher":"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/canadanuclear","article_published_time":"2011-07-07T04:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-27T15:45:06+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Chart281.png","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"cna_admin","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"cna_admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/"},"author":{"name":"cna_admin","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/b0c8179b9b04ade90057bc7a30b2fbd2"},"headline":"Canadian Nuclear Attitude&nbsp;Survey","datePublished":"2011-07-07T04:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-27T15:45:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/"},"wordCount":863,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Chart281.png","articleSection":["Talk Nuclear"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/","url":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/","name":"Canadian Nuclear Attitude Survey - Association nucl\u00e9aire canadienne","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Chart281.png","datePublished":"2011-07-07T04:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-27T15:45:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Chart281.png","contentUrl":"http:\/\/talknuclear.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/Chart281.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/2011\/07\/07\/canadian-nuclear-attitude-survey\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Canadian Nuclear Attitude&nbsp;Survey"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/","name":"Canadian Nuclear Association","description":"The national voice of the Canadian nuclear industry since 1960","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#organization","name":"Canadian Nuclear Association","url":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/cropped-cna-logo-only.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/cropped-cna-logo-only.png","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Canadian Nuclear Association"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/canadanuclear","https:\/\/x.com\/canadanuclear","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/canadanuclear","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/CanadaNuclear","http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/canadian-nuclear-association"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/b0c8179b9b04ade90057bc7a30b2fbd2","name":"cna_admin","url":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/author\/cna_admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27602"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28966,"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27602\/revisions\/28966"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27602"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cna.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=27602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}